Pages

Tuesday, October 14, 2025

2025-10-13

***** denotes well-worth reading in full at source (even if excerpted extensively here)


Economic and Market Fare:

Market timing, the impossible dream!

........................... In market strategy speak, these are words that are at war with each other, since markets can either be “fairly valued” or “highly valued”, but not both, but I don’t blame Powell for being evasive.

........................... The aggregate market capitalization of the Mag Seven, as a percent of market cap of all traded US companies, has risen from 17.5% at the end of 2022 to 24.6% at the end of 2023 to 29.3% at the end of 2024. Focusing just on 2025, the Mag Seven took a step back in the first quarter, dropping to 26.3% of overall market cap on March 31, 2025, but has made a decisive comeback since, with an increase in market cap of $2.8 trillion in the first nine months of 2025, accounting for 52.4% of the overall increase in market capitalization this year. In fact, the Mag Seven now command 30.35% of the total market capitalization for US equities, a higher percent than at the start of the year. Over the last three years, the Mag Seven alone have accounted for more than half of the increase in market capitalization of all US equities, each year.



Equities sit at a pivotal inflection point, with competing forces in play. The macro hinge remains the inflation–Fed easing trajectory: stabilization enables policy support, while persistence forces repricing. Execution on AI and Q3 earnings is equally critical — mega-cap leaders must deliver against high expectations to sustain stretched multiples. Geopolitical and trade frictions, plus shutdown risk, linger as exogenous shocks. Market breadth remains the key tell: broadening supports durability, while Mag7 concentration signals fragility.

I’ve been fielding repeated client questions this weekend on the bull vs. bear setup. My stance: constructive into year-end, with technical headwinds fading and a rally base forming.

Framework: Client activity through positioning and flows.

Bull Case
  • Technology & AI: Structural productivity gains as leaders execute.
  • Fed Support: Stable inflation preserves optionality for rate cuts, supportive for risk assets.
  • Economic Resilience: Healthy consumer and corporate balance sheets contain little recession risk.
  • Discretionary Positioning & Neutral Sentiment: Cooling post-euphoria creates runway for Q4 upside.
  • Global Growth: Forward estimates re-accelerating, tilt toward cyclicals.
  • Consumer Balance Sheets: Household equity exposure up +542% since 2020 provides incremental demand.
Bear Case
  • Valuations: Tech/AI multiples risk bubble dynamics.
  • Earnings Bar: High expectations, particularly in mega-cap tech, create risk of disappointment.
  • Macro Headwinds: Inflation, tariffs, and trade frictions threaten Fed easing; Oct. 15 CPI is a pivot risk.
  • Breadth: ~$0.35 of every SPY $ goes into Mag7; concentration heightens factor fragility.
  • Complacency: Momentum dominance + crowded positioning raise shock risk.
It is time for a thread. ..............


Just wanted to share some context for how I think about news and events. The response to these things is often state dependent.

A candle flame never holds still. At times it burns tall and thin, quivering in still air. At other times it shortens, thickens, and steadies after being buffeted. In both cases, the flame follows the same physics, yet its response to a draft is entirely different. A small breeze topples the tall flame violently, while the same breeze barely shifts the stubby, turbulent one.

Markets behave the same way. Their reactions are not determined by the news itself but by the state of positioning and hedging when that news arrives. This is the essence of state-dependent reactions: the same shock produces radically different outcomes depending on whether the market is stretched thin or already washed out.

Predictable rhythms
Even in its restlessness, the flame has a rhythm. About ten times a second it flickers, driven by buoyancy and vortex shedding. Markets, too, breathe in cycles shaped by mechanical flows that repeat with calendar and structure:
  • Corporate buybacks. Each quarter, predictable capital returns to equities outside blackout windows.
  • 401(k) and retirement contributions. Biweekly payroll allocations funnel steadily into equities and funds.
  • Rebalancing flows. At month- and quarter-end, pensions and balanced mandates reset allocations to targets. Equities are sold after strong months and bought after weak ones, creating systematic calendar-linked flows.
  • Index rebalancing. Russell reconstitution, MSCI, and S&P reviews generate directional demand in specific names on known dates.
  • Options expiration (OPEX). Monthly and quarterly expirations shift dealer gamma exposure and hedging flows.
  • Volatility-controlled annuities. Equity exposure rises or falls mechanically as realized volatility drifts.
  • CTA and trend strategies. Systematic futures flows expand or contract as price signals flip.
  • Dealer gamma. Whether moves are absorbed or amplified depends on positioning around crowded strikes.
  • Seasonality. August and December thin liquidity, September and October carry higher risk premia, fiscal year-ends create bond demand.
These flows are the flame’s steady oscillation. They do not predict each flicker of the tip, but they set the pulse beneath the dance.

Drafts and shocks
No model, however elegant, survives the opening of a door. The mathematics of turbulence can capture the rhythm of a flame, but they cannot anticipate the sudden draft from a window, the shift in room temperature, or the uneven burn of the wick. In that instant, the model breaks—not because the laws changed, but because the system was touched by forces outside its frame.

Markets are no different. Policy surprises, geopolitical ruptures, macro data shocks, earnings announcements, and sudden turns in sentiment are the drafts that blow across prices. Their arrival cannot be scheduled, and their impact cannot be captured in equations that assume steady states.

The crucial point is not that shocks exist, but that their impact depends on the state of the market when they strike.

State-dependent reactions
A flame responds differently depending on its shape. When it burns tall and thin, even the faintest breath makes it thrash. When it has already been buffeted, the flame shortens, thickens, steadies; the same disturbance now barely moves it, sometimes even centering it. The draft is the same, but the outcome is different because the state has changed.

Markets are similar.

In 2018 volatility was pinned near historic lows, the world crowded into short-volatility products, and dealers structurally short gamma. A modest rise in VIX futures — hardly more than a draft — detonated the entire edifice. ETPs collapsed, hedging cascaded, equities convulsed.

In early 2020 the flame was tall and thin. Volatility was subdued, dealers were short gamma, hedges were scarce, vol-control annuities had levered up, and CTAs were near max long. The system was fragile, stretched. When the draft of COVID struck, the collapse was violent—not only because the shock was large, but because the state amplified it. Deleveraging cascaded through systematic funds, vol spiked, liquidity vanished, and the flame snapped violently sideways.

By 2022 the flame had been battered into a short, stubby shape. Volatility was high, sentiment washed out, CTAs had cut exposure, and dealers were long vol. Protection was widely held, positioning lighter. Shocks still came—each CPI surprise, each hawkish Fed turn—but they landed on a market already hardened. Some even steadied the flame: volatility collapsed as hedges were monetized, dealers bought back delta, and prices rallied on “bad” news.

Reflection
For investors, the flame’s lesson is humility. Structure sets the rhythm, but state dictates the reaction. The same headline may topple a fragile market and steady a hardened one. Preparation matters more than prediction: to know when the system is stretched thin, when it is coiled low, when fragility demands caution, and when resilience allows endurance.

Closing
A flame can generally be modelled by physics, but its dance is never the same. It sways differently when it burns tall and fragile than when it burns short and steady. Markets mirror this truth. The same shock can topple or steady, depending on the state of positioning and hedging.

Other systems echo the lesson. Waves arrive in predictable sets, yet no two crests break alike. A glass falling from a shelf always shatters, but the shards scatter in ways no model can map. These images, like the flame, remind us that markets are not random but state-dependent: predictable in rhythm, unpredictable in detail.

The task for investors is not to chase the flicker, the crest, or the shard. It is to understand the state: when the flame is stretched, when the tide is rising, when the glass is brittle. In that state lies the difference between a shock that steadies and one that shatters.



........ This year, the monthly situation report of the BLS has deteriorated to such an extent that virtually all of the modest increase in payroll jobs is in the low-paying health and social services category. At the same time, real GDP has remained resolutely strong. The issue is how to resolve this discrepancy. The answer is provided by a statistic called Gross Output (GO) – a measure of spending at all stages of production. Developed by economist Mark Skousen, the Bureau of Economic Analysis now publishes GO in the final revision of the quarterly National Income and Product Accounts. In the first quarter, real GO was $40.9 trillion, 72% more than real GDP. 

In stark contrast to real GDP, the two-quarter moving average growth in real GO decelerated steadily and significantly after 2022, dropping to a paltry less than 1% annual rate of growth in the first half of this year (Chart 2). Thus, GO and the job statistics are strongly aligned with the well-established model of falling plant capacity utilization and the likely impact of AI and tariffs. Real GO is additional confirmation that economic conditions are weaker than generally  believed. 


The yellow metal says one thing; Treasuries and the dollar anothe

............... There are several ways to resolve the contradiction between the debasement trade concept and the behaviour of the dollar and the long bond. 

It may be that the “debasement” view is just plain wrong. Dario Perkins of TS Lombard says it’s just “another bullshit narrative. Emerging market central banks have clearly been buying gold, to diversify out of the dollar. That wasn’t really ‘debasement’. And now it’s become a momentum trade. The [gold] market is so illiquid, it only takes a few tinfoil hat nutters to drive the price up.” Ed Al-Hussainy of Columbia Threadneedle says the debasement idea “is just wrong — what can I tell you? If people’s views on this argument have not been changed by the data over the last six months, they are not going to change.” 

Alternatively, you can argue that debasement is not just about the US, and in fact is less evident in the US than elsewhere. Gold is “is not just a rejection of the US dollar — it is a lifeboat from ALL fiat currencies”, James Athey of Marlborough Group writes. Albert Edwards of Société Générale notes to Unhedged that “the US [30-year bond] this year is an outlier in generally drifting sideways recently but on a gentle upward trend. Elsewhere the sharper upward trend is very much still intact.” ........


Learn why silver is currently in a sustainable, long-term bull market that will lead to permanently higher prices, unlike the short-lived spikes of 1980 and 2011 that shattered investors' hopes







Bubble Fare:

America’s AI Economy Explained

The U.S. economy seems to have entered a strange new phase where GDP growth is being manufactured through financial reflexivity rather than organic demand. The AI boom sits at the centre of this distortion. Nvidia lends or invests in AI developers like OpenAI, who then use that same financing to buy Nvidia chips. What appears in the national accounts as investment-led growth is, in truth, a closed loop of capital, money circulating within the same ecosystem and being recorded as new output. The result is GDP inflated by intercompany leverage rather than by genuine income generation.

This is what can be called reflexive investment spending that exists primarily because of rising valuations and easy financing within a self-referential system. It differs profoundly from net-producing investment spending, which arises from real demand, generates sustainable income, and expands the economy’s productive capacity. Reflexive investment feeds on market capitalization; net-producing investment feeds on profitability and consumption. The former inflates GDP mechanically, the latter raises it meaningfully. Much of what is now reported as “investment” belongs to the reflexive type, circular spending within the AI and semiconductor complex, financed by equity and debt that depend on the same valuations they sustain. ...................

....................... 
This is why the bubble feels solid. The contribution to growth can persist for years, just as it did before the 1999 crash, because both financial and fiscal policy are aligned to sustain it. Reflexive investment becomes policy; speculation becomes strategy. But the underlying mechanics are unchanged: capital is being recycled, not created.

What we are witnessing is the most sophisticated bubble in modern history, a system borrowing growth, income, and even fiscal space from the future to preserve the illusion of endless expansion. It will last only as long as confidence holds, until markets realize that the rosy future everyone is borrowing from may never arrive.


How rising corporatism fuels the "everything rally," and how Trump could instrumentalize it for his fight against inflation, leading to harsher unintended consequences

Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power. - Benito Mussolini

It’s been some time since the decisions of leading politicians and major corporations so heavily influenced the economic trajectory. While Mussolini’s quote may seem intriguing at first glance, one should look at it solely from an economic perspective.

I believe the Western world is economically headed in such a direction. Once again, America appears to be leading the charge. However, instead of ushering in a surge of economic prosperity, the Western hemisphere might be sleepwalking into one of the greatest crises in modern history.

That doesn’t mean the world is ending tomorrow or that asset markets will collapse overnight. But the more I reflect on the recent policies of Trump, European governments, and Japan, the more I conclude that the “corporatism” Mussolini described is on the rise again.

To be clear, this didn’t start with Trump’s second term; the process was already underway, largely beneath the surface. Corporatism has two faces: one left-wing, the other right-wing...........

......... Recall what Trump and Treasury Secretary Bessent have said. Both are sending a clear message to markets: the US government will spend heavily and prop up markets to “grow out of the debt,” meaning growth will outpace debt. That signals investors to allocate money to assets and reduce cash exposure.

These policies have fueled the current rally, and I believe this is not the beginning of the end but the end of the beginning. However, this cycle differs from past ones, which is why many market observers are confused by the excesses occurring now. ................


A wave of deals and partnerships are escalating concerns that the trillion-dollar AI boom is being propped up by interconnected business transactions.




We’re in a bubble. Everybody says we’re in a bubble. You can’t say we’re not in a bubble anymore without sounding insane, because everybody is now talking about how OpenAI has promised everybody $1 trillion — something you could have read about two weeks ago on my premium newsletter.

Yet we live in a chaotic, insane world, where we can watch the news and hear hand-wringing over the fact that we’re in a bubble, read article after CEO after article after CEO after analyst after investor saying we’re in a bubble, yet the market continues to rip ever-upward on increasingly more-insane ideas, in part thanks to analysts that continue to ignore the very signs that they’re relied upon to read.

AMD and OpenAI signed a very strange deal where AMD will give OpenAI the chance to buy 160 million shares at a cent a piece, in tranches of indeterminate size, for every gigawatt of data centers OpenAI builds using AMD’s chips, adding that OpenAI has agreed to buy “six gigawatts of GPUs.”

This is a peculiar way to measure GPUs, which are traditionally measured in the price of each GPU, but nevertheless, these chips are going to be a mixture of AMD’s mi450 instinct GPUs — which we don’t know the specs of! — and its current generation mi350 GPUs, making the actual scale of these purchases a little difficult to grasp, though the Wall Street Journal says it would “result in tens of billions of dollars in new revenue” for AMD.

This AMD deal is weird, but one that’s rigged in favour of Lisa Su and AMD. OpenAI doesn’t get a dollar at any point - it has work out how to buy those GPUs and figure out how to build six further gigawatts of data centers on top of the 10GW of data centers it promised to build for NVIDIA and the seven-to-ten gigawatts that are allegedly being built for Stargate, bringing it to a total of somewhere between 23 and 26 gigawatts of data center capacity. 

Hell, while we’re on the subject, has anyone thought about how difficult and expensive it is to build a data center? 

Everybody is very casual with how they talk about Sam Altman’s theoretical promises of trillions of dollars of data center infrastructure, and I'm not sure anybody realizes how difficult even the very basics of this plan will be. ..................






Institutions are expected to double their digital asset portfolio exposure from 7% to 16% within three years, according to new research from State Street.



.......................................................................
Conclusion
The GENIUS Act is a disastrous law that poses grave and unacceptable threats to our financial and economic future. Congress must remove those threats by (1) repealing the GENIUS Act and passing legislation that requires all stablecoin providers to be FDIC-insured banks, and (2) adopting legislation that requires all crypto derivatives to comply with the rules governing non-digital derivatives under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act.



Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly shaping how information is created and disseminated, from companies using them to craft persuasive advertisements, to election campaigns optimizing messaging to gain votes, to social media influencers boosting engagement. These settings are inherently competitive, with sellers, candidates, and influencers vying for audience approval, yet it remains poorly understood how competitive feedback loops influence LLM behavior. We show that optimizing LLMs for competitive success can inadvertently drive misalignment. Using simulated environments across these scenarios, we find that, 6.3% increase in sales is accompanied by a 14.0% rise in deceptive marketing; in elections, a 4.9% gain in vote share coincides with 22.3% more disinformation and 12.5% more populist rhetoric; and on social media, a 7.5% engagement boost comes with 188.6% more disinformation and a 16.3% increase
in promotion of harmful behaviors. We call this phenomenon Moloch’s Bargain for AI—competitive success achieved at the cost of alignment. These misaligned behaviors emerge even when models are explicitly instructed to remain truthful and grounded, revealing the fragility of current alignment safeguards.



Quotes of the Week:


...


Charts:
1: 







(not just) for the ESG crowd:



Sci Fare:





U.S. B.S.:

Trump’s newest presidential memoranda criminalizes critics of empire, capitalism, Christian nationalism, abuses by the state and those who fight racism and gender discrimination.

Fascists, historically, are surprisingly candid about the world they intend to create. Those they target, despite this transparency, are surprisingly obtuse about what is coming.

The most ominous warning to date from our homegrown fascists is the latest Presidential memo, “Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence.” It accuses any critic of law enforcement, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the American empire, capitalism, the Christian right, the persecution of immigrants and those that decry discrimination based on race and gender, as well as those who question white, male patriarchy, described as “traditional American views on family, religion, and morality,” of fomenting “violent revolution.” .................

........................ This is not simply a war on the left, which is a marginal and ineffective force in American society, but a war on the remnants of our liberal institutions and those that support them. Once these establishment institutions and their representatives are neutered those of us on the left will be next. ................

........................ Fascists mean what they say. The rhetoric condemning the rest of us is not hyperbolic. They cannot be reasoned with. We cannot open channels of dialogue and communication. Our anemic and calcified democracy, including our bankrupt liberal institutions, cannot defeat them. Fascists are the swamp creatures that rise up out of all failed democracies.

Our enemies intend to implement this dystopia. The question is not if, but when. How long before the iron bars slam shut and America as we know it disappears? How long before the state rounds us up and hauls us away?

I can’t say. But it won’t be long.


New directive targets “anti-Christian,” “anti-American,” and “anti-capitalism” opinions

.................................................... I don’t want to sound hyperbolic but the plain truth is that NSPM-7 is a declaration of war on anyone who does not support the Trump administration and its agenda. Yes, it repeats the word “violent” over and over to purport only to go after citizens who are moved to take up arms, but it also directs monitoring and intelligence collection to map and target the new “evildoers,” to borrow a Bush label he took from the Bible just days after 9/11. ..............


Our brains are very delicate things. Too much stress can destroy them easily.

Is Donald Trump’s mind gone? Or is he playing a sophisticated chess game with us? ..............................

.................. In any case, dementia is one of the many examples of the “Seneca Effect;” when a mind starts to decline, ruin is rapid. We’ll see what happens to Trump’s mind in the coming years, perhaps months.



Geopolitical Fare:

***** Lawrence: “Justice and power.”
The defining conflict of our time.



Edward Said ends his introduction to Orientalism with a plea for “unlearning”: “If [Orientalism] stimulates a new kind of dealing with the Orient, indeed if it eliminates the ‘Orient’ and ‘Occident’ altogether, then we shall have advanced a little in the process of what Raymond Williams has called the ‘unlearning’ of ‘the inherent dominative mode.’”[1] Unlearning Orientalism, exposing and dismantling its racist grammar, is tantamount to destroying the meanings of “Occident” and “Orient,” since the “East” is at its core nothing more than a phantasmatic projection of the “West.” Unlearning as a critical pedagogical practice holds the promise of liberating us from ontological segregations and the most persistent of binarisms, that of the civilized (the European) and the savage (the non-European).

In my essay, I want to expand on unlearning Orientalism by focusing more precisely on Zionism, on the many challenges of unlearning Zionism in fascist times. The new McCarthyism that has emerged in the United States as a brutal response to the pro-Palestine solidarity movement must be seen as a child of Zionism, as an accelerated effect of an institutionalized Zionist learning. ....................

In today’s fascist times, Israel’s brazenness knows no shame; its impunity meets no limits. ............

The scandal: an ongoing Palestinian genocide hasn’t altered the consciousness of most of America’s political leaders, its liberal and economic elite, along with the vast majority of its journalists and pundits in corporate media. And, contemptibly, Holocaust memory is actively deployed by pro-Israel groups to prevent such alteration from taking place. ....................



Okay, reach for your tin foil hats and let’s stroll down the Conspiratorial Rabbit Trail. Ready, Everyone? Here goes:

When the Special Military Operation began in early 2022, during the 8th year of fighting in Ukraine, the new aspect of the conflict was cast strictly in terms of Democracy vs. Autocracy; valiant Ukraine holding back the onslaught of Russian tyranny; or the defense of Western democratic values against dark barbarism from the East; or the Rules-Based International Order against the forces of Chaos, etc. etc. No one talks that way today, unless it is Kalla Kallas, or the Lithuanian prime minister, Keith Kellogg, or cringingly recently by King Charles III. I suppose Anthony Blinken would, if he had access to a microphone. But he doesn’t.

The problem is, of course, that liberal democracy did not turn out to be the Fukuyamaian End of History that it was purported to be. (In February 2022, before my current views had quite solidified, I distinctly remember thinking, however, “Oh, History is back.”) The decline of democracy, so-stated, is most pronounced where its horn is tooted the most: Europe. Orwell predicted rightly, all political animals are equal, but some political animals are more equal than others. Don’t ask questions in Romania. Or Moldova. Running as an AfD candidate in Germany can get you fitted for a coffin in no time flat. And don’t even get me started on the U.K., where the governing elites are certifiably insane, and whose Prime Minister I’ve recently heard characterized as Tony Blair’s sock-puppet.

Real political expression can often seem more vibrant in the vilified countries–Russia, Hungary, Slovakia–though it may not translate to real political options. But no matter, dissent is decidedly not welcome in the European Parliament. Just ask Georgia what happens when you try to chart an independent course, based on your own country’s national interest. And of course, there is that bastion of freedom itself, Ukraine, where, if you are a man under 60 years of age, you don’t dare emerge from your flat, even if wheelchair-bound.

A friend characterized it thusly: “Ukraine is being not so much governed, as torn up at her beleaguered roots, by a bloodthirsty power-drunk drug-addicted neoliberal narcissist clown.” A clown, I might add, who is still allowed to address the United Nations. Anyone, (Simon Tisdall in today’s Guardian, for example) still repeating the Democracy vs. Tyranny narrative is simply not a serious person; to be avoided at cocktail parties and whose blatherings are to be dismissed out of hand.

As any reader here knows, I prefer Realist interpretations, best stated by John Mearsheimer, to-wit: Projection of Western hegemony vs. Russia’s “Red Line” (Eastward expansion of NATO vs. Russia’s defense of their Western border.) Realism rejects the view of NATO as a benign defensive alliance, which collapses in the face of even a cursory view of actual history. Russians had good reasons for viewing it as an existential threat directed at them, which of course it was.

The eastward march of NATO, the coup d’etat of 2014, the creeping NATOization of Ukraine in late 2021—all in the face of repeated, consistent, and increasingly urgent warnings from Moscow–do not need to be recounted again here. The real agenda was not, of course, the incorporation of what was demonstrably the most corrupt nation in Europe into NATO, but rather the destablization of Russia itself. For the Empire of the West, regime change is always on the agenda. Always. And so it will be until the Empire falls. 

The idea, it seems, was always to overthrow the Russian government and/or oversee the establishment of a compliant one (a la Ukraine), and perhaps break the country up into more manageable bits. Once this was accomplished, we could turn our full attention to China. If this was indeed the plan, it has been a failure of yet unimagined and colossal magnitude that it indeed heralds the death of the Empire itself. Or so I thought.

Tin-foil hats secured? Consider this: What if the ultimate plan was never to defeat Russia at all? For it has rarely been done; the Golden Horde almost pulled it off some 800 years ago, and Sweden scored some victories for a season over 400 years ago. We expect such fantastical thinking from the EU elites (and Fredreich Merz, who raises no alarms by speaking of rearming Germany again.) But I would expect there to be at least a few objective students of History within the bowels of our Permanent State. Rather, what if the immediate plan is the the defeat of Europe, not Russia; reducing it to permanent vassal state status? There are three main ways in which this is being accomplished: ..................

................. So, if this is the plan, I must say that it is succeeding beyond anyone’s wildest imagination. And the Russians have been exceedingly helpful. ......................



....................... You can thank Trump for this. His chip and Huawei sanctions taught the Chinese they had to control their entire own tech stack. Before that they preferred American, Korean and Taiwanese chips. No big Chinese company would buy Chinese crap chips. If the US hadn’t decided on its moronic trade war, China would have allowed it to gracefully age out of its Empire, letting it keep some areas of technological superiority.

As usual, the Chinese played this ice cold. They took their lumps, they devalued the yuan, they made concessions. When Biden came in, he doubled down so they realized it wasn’t just a democratic hiccup, but core policy agreed to by both parties. Then Trump came in and went on his insane tariff blitz. Worked against his vassals, but China doesn’t have to take America’s crap any more and it isn’t.

Now, as the kids like to say, having fucked around, America and the West are about to “find out.” Revenge served ice fucking cold.

I want to be really clear on a couple things here.

First, China is not going to leave the US or the West anything meaningful in terms of tech lead. They are going to take the tech lead, with the industry to back it up, in essentially everything (they’re already in the lead in at least 80% of areas, so don’t kid yourself about the rest.) And they are going to break the US’s hold on the Americas too. By the time China is done with America, they’ll be lucky to still have have Mexico and Canada as vassals (which is why they might invade and is why the US is threatening Venezuela before it gets a full suite of Chinese and Russian weapons.)

Second: if you are in charge of any country in the world that is an American vassal and you have an IQ above 90 and the smallest amount of interest in the future of your country, your job right now is to transfer your allegiance to China and get the best deal you can in exchange. The longer you wait, the worse the deal will be.  .................


The Israeli-US vision for Palestinians has long been capitulation, and two years of genocide in Gaza offer a new opportunity to impose it.

Given the scale of Palestinian suffering in Gaza after two years of Israeli mass murder and starvation sieges, Hamas may have no choice but to accept the ultimatum handed down by President Trump. Yet whatever comes of the ceasefire talks underway in Egypt, Trump’s proposals should not be seen as a “peace plan.” Instead, the Trump administration seeks the full surrender not just of Hamas, but of the struggle for Palestinian self-determination. .......................

.................................... Like their more moderate predecessors, Trump and Netanyahu are not interested in compromise. The Israeli-US plan for Palestinians has long been surrender, and two years of genocide have given them a new opportunity to impose it.


When have the Zionists ever kept their word?





‘Victory has a thousand fathers. Defeat is an orphan’. Attributed to Count Ciano

How very true. Thunderous self-congratulations echo over the temporary ceasefire in Gaza that many hope will end two years of massacre, kidnappings and war crimes in this open-air prison camp.

President Donald Trump, hot in pursuit of the Nobel Peace prize, claims authorship of the just concluded ceasefire and prisoner release. His American supporters and legions of sycophants are heaping praise and accolades on him. Trump says he may shortly fly to the Mideast to ink an agreement.

I call this political kabuki. Like the so-called Abraham accords in Trump’s first term, the Gaza agreement is a sweetheart deal between US allies and satraps. Its primary object is to deflect the worldwide outcry against the genocide in Gaza fueled by US money, arms and diplomatic cover. ..........




Vid Fare:

The Israeli Government has made an ad about the Global Sumud Flotilla headed for Gaza, and it’s surprsingly honest and informative



Book Fare:


When last we heard from Thomas Pynchon, it was the Year of Our Lord 2013. Charismatic neoliberal Barack Obama had recently defeated generic plutocrat Mitt Romney to win a second term. Whistleblower Edward Snowden was typing under a bedsheet in a hotel room in Hong Kong, having leaked information about the NSA’s surveillance programmes to Glenn Greenwald of the Guardian. Real estate mogul and reality TV star Donald Trump told a British interviewer that if he were to run for president his campaign slogan would be ‘Make America Great Again’; the interviewer scoffed that it would never catch on. Bleeding Edge, Pynchon’s eighth novel, set in New York between the popping of the tech bubble and the global war on terror, was published in September, when the most interesting conspiracy theories going were that the President wasn’t born in the United States, 9/11 was an inside job, and that the government was doing research on psyops and time travel at the Montauk Air Force Station in Long Island. Simpler times.

From QAnon to PizzaGate to RussiaGate, to Jewish space lasers to the dead internet theory to microchips in the vaccines to congressional hearings on UFOs to the Epstein files, the last twelve years have provided a rich vein of baroque paranoia. Yet Pynchon, whose name is virtually synonymous with both things, has chosen to set his new novel in the Depression-era Midwest, in the days of Hoovervilles, Prohibition, pre-code Hollywood and Big Band swing. ........



Other Fare:


....... When I say that neoliberalism was defeated I do not mean than it was intellectually defeated in the sense than there is an alternative ready-made project waiting in the wings to replace it. No: like communism, neoliberalism was defeated by reality. Real world simply refused to behave the way that liberals thought it should. .................................


What caused the global populist wave? Blame the screens.




Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)