Roger Ibbotson found that the most illiquid stocks generate the highest market returns. From 1980 – 2013, Low Liquidity stocks generated a 15.57% ~4% higher than the Russell 2000s 11.66% CAGR.
The results were even better when Ibbotson combined low liquidity with micro market caps. From 1972 – 2013, the least liquid and smallest market capitalization companies generated a 16.30% CAGR. Large, highly liquid stocks posted only a 9% CAGR during that time.
But once you add a value filter, the results get silly. Ibbotson found that the least liquid, most “value-based” stocks returned 19.3% annually from 1972 – 2013.
Low liquidity + cheap price + small market cap = excess returns .......
A collection of my favorite PDFs, podcasts, YouTube lectures, and more from Value Investing OG Bruce Greenwald
......... Googling “Bruce Greenwald PDF” produced a treasure trove of value investing learning documents. Do yourself a favor and print these out. You’ll do tons of underlining, highlighting, and learning! ......
Most important takeaway from Q4 GDP data is that short rates are finally above inflation and nominal growth for final sales of domestic product. “Tight” is a matter of opinion, but monetary policy is no longer “easy” and now getting “tighter” -- growth and inflation decelerated through the quarter. My expectation of a mild recession beginning in Q2 appears on track. There is the swing to positive real rates, the beginnings of a mild inventory correction, and the “asset crunch” softening growth on into the current quarter (I wrote how the asset cycle changes how monetary policy works in Oct 2019). Next week’s 25 BP hike has all the earmarks of being the last hike. Cuts arrive once employment turns negative, or even just softens to 100,000/month.
Optically strong US growth data does not take 2023 rate cuts off the agenda.
My colleague, Ed Harrison, reckons the Fed rate cuts in 2023 are likely off the table.
In the words of Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction: “Allow me to retort.”
The first release of 4Q22 GDP just came out, ahead of expectations, at 2.9%.
The problem with a lot of economic data is it is lagging and frequently revised.
GDP is one of the more lagging economic series. But if we look at what is leading lately, the figures point to significant growth deterioration over the next six to nine months. This is plenty of time for the Fed to stop hiking and begin cutting before the year is out.
The largest percentage-point contribution to fourth-quarter GDP was the change in private inventories. This is one of the most volatile GDP components. On top of that it lags inventory-to-sales ratios, which have risen sharply. Inventories are likely to be strongly negatively contributing to GDP growth by the second or third quarter. ....
The Bureau of Labor Statistics just released the Business Employment Dynamics Summary from Q2-2022 and it points to NEGATIVE job-growth last year. Is the job market already MUCH weaker than anticipated in the US, and were we already in recession in 2022?
On one hand, the non-farm-payrolls report continued to show increasing employment through Q2-Q4 in 2022, while the househould survey hinted of flatlining employment at best and on the other hand the BLS just revealed that the net job gains of Q2-2022 were -287k (Press release: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cewbd.nr0.htm)
Were we already in a recession in 2022?
This question could be of major relevance to this years asset performance, if it indeed was the case that 2022 was a recession. ........
“The risk of over-tightening by the European Central Bank is nothing less than catastrophic” says Prof Kenneth Rogoff .
At Davos he also said: “Italy is extremely vulnerable. But this could pop anywhere. Global debt has gone up massively since the pandemic: public debt, corporate debt, everything.”
Rogoff believes that it is a miracle that the world averted a financial crisis in 2022, but the odds of a major accident are shortening as the delayed effects of past tightening feed through.
As Rogoff said: “We were very fortunate that we didn’t have a global systemic event in 2022, and we can count our blessings for that, but rates are still going higher and the risk keeps rising.”
But lurking in the murkiness is also the global financial assets/liabilities which is almost $500 trillion including the shadow banking system at 46% of the total. ....
A new report via Massachusetts-based International Data Corporation (IDC) revealed worldwide smartphone shipments experienced the most significant quarterly drop on record over the holiday season as cooling consumer demand suggests trouble for smartphone manufacturers ahead of earnings releases.
Meeting the social needs of the world’s population through the production of goods and services depends on the amount of labour employed (in numbers and hours) and on the productivity of those of employed. Under capitalism, of course, what matters more is the profitability to the owners of the means of production from employing workers and in investing in productivity-enhancing technology. It is a fundamental contradiction of the capitalist mode of production that the required profitability of those owning the means of production becomes an obstacle to the required production to meet the social needs of the billions of humanity (and, for that matter, to sustain the health of the planet and other species).
About three years ago I posted some thoughts on the global decline in population growth and the future size of the global workforce available for capital to exploit. It’s worth updating the story. .........
............................ Capital can expand if it can increase value from the exploitation of more labour or increase the rate of exploitation of the existing workforce. The latter is increasingly difficult and growth in the former is decelerating – except in Africa. This continent has suffered centuries of slave exports to the advanced world and the break-up through colonial occupation of its native lands. Now it must face the prospect of increased exploitation of its burgeoning workforce as capital seeks new sources of labour to boost profitability.
Well, maybe not that certain, because one year later stocks did drop, but nowhere nearly as much as Grantham predicted, with the S&P sliding 20% in 2022 and the Nasdaq losing a third. Hardly the catastrophic bursting of a superbubble which has inflated stock prices by order of magnitude.
But with Grantham, now 84 and eager to make at least one more historic call before his career is over, is not giving up and in a new paper published today titled "After a Timeout, Back to the Meat Grinder!", the value investor is doubling down on his call from last January (and January 2021... and June 2020), and warns - again - that the popping of the bubble in US stocks is far from over and investors shouldn’t get too excited about the strong start to the year for the market. .....
Prepare for Brown Swan Event
A Black Swan event - coined by Nassim Taleb - is a rare and highly unpredictable event that no one sees coming. A Brown Swan event - coined by me - is a rare and highly predictable event that no one sees coming. ....
.... In order to be a true contrarian investor and otherwise survive the entire business cycle, one must be willing able to endure times like these when the herd is stampeding off of a cliff. I can tell from my Twitter stats, that many bears capitulated in January and joined the stampeding bulls. That's what happens at the end. ....
To paraphrase, in English - crashes are far more common than a normal aka. random distribution would have us believe. However, recall that in "Fooled By Randomness" when Nassim Taleb introduces the Black Swan event he calls it a RANDOM event. Hence the name of the book. However, the problem is that as the CBOE admits, crashes are NOT random. They are highly correlated to WELL KNOWN risk factors such as over-valuation, interest rates, positioning, lack of hedging, and SPECULATION. In the Minsky Hypothesis, crashes are inevitable and usually caused by monetary tightening in an inflationary economy such as the one we are in right now:
"Over a protracted period of good times, capitalist economies tend to move from a financial structure dominated by hedge finance units to a structure in which there is large weight to units engaged in speculative and Ponzi finance. Furthermore, if an economy with a sizeable body of speculative financial units is in an inflationary state, and the authorities attempt to exorcise inflation by monetary constraint, then speculative units will become Ponzi units and the net worth of previously Ponzi units will quickly evaporate. Consequently, units with cash flow shortfalls will be forced to try to make position by selling out position. This is likely to lead to a collapse of asset values"
....
Quotes of the Week:
Mac: The Fed is set to raise rates again next week and STILL not one pundit has caught on to the fact that interest rates are too tight and Fed balance sheet is too loose. The Fed is imploding the economy, but not the markets. Which is driving a chasmic divergence between fantasy and reality. This week, the Conference Board Leading Index confirmed that the economy is heading for a hard landing. The Fed has never hiked rates with leading indicators at this level. Therefore we have now officially crossed the Rubicon of unprecedented policy disaster aka. "BTFD".
Charts:
1:
2: 3: 4: 4b: 5: 6: 7: 8:
(not just) for the ESG crowd:
............ “Global demand for critical minerals is going to skyrocket over the next decades…Electric vehicles help reduce carbon emissions and they support the global response to the climate crisis,” the Secretary of State continued, draping the plundering of Africa’s wealth in friendly green-speak.
Siddhartha Kara, an academic and author of four widely-praised books exposing the business of human trafficking and slavery in Africa, has spent several years in rural Congo documenting the most hideous – and largely hidden – abuses of US multinational supply chains and mining operations.
Kara remarked to The Grayzone that the agreements hashed out at the US Africa Summit “will mean more demand for minerals used in EVs, leading to more exploitation, abuse, and misery for the women, children, and men who scrounge the world’s cobalt out of the dirt in the DR Congo.” .......
“The crisis over the Colorado River is the latest example of how climate change is overwhelming the foundations of American life — not only physical infrastructure, like dams and reservoirs, but also the legal underpinnings that have made those systems work.”
In a post-Covid world, the emergence of digital kiosk systems has allowed businesses to offer consumers a new tipping option. These high-tech point-of-sales machines are popping up across all sorts of businesses, not just restaurants.
Or, to expand the acronyms in the family blog-friendly headline, “Artificial Intelligence[1] = Bullshit.” This is very easy to prove. In the first part of this short-and-sweet post, I will do that. Then, I will give some indication of the state of play of this latest Silicon Valley Bezzle, sketch a few of the implications, and conclude.
Fortunately for us all, we have well-known technical definition of bullshit, from Princeton philosopher Harry Frankfurt. From Frankfurt’s classic On Bullshit, page 34, on Wittengenstein discussing a (harmless, unless taken literally) remark by his Cambridge acquaintance Fania Pascal:
It is in this sense that Pascal statement is unconnected to a concern with truth: she is not concerned with the truth-value of what she says. That is why she cannot be regarded as lying; for she does not presume that she knows the truth, and therefore she cannot be deliberately promulgating a proposition that she presumes to be false: Her statement is grounded neither in a belief that it is true nor, as a lie must be, in a belief that it is not true. It is just this lack of connection to a concern with truth — this indifference to how things really are — that I regard as of the essence of bullshit.
So there we have our definition.
Yet commentators and politicians keep missing it
Dynamics of gender and class in the Covid-era labor market
........ In what follows, we highlight the gendered dimensions of “The Great Resignation” in both the United States and China, which have been mostly neglected thus far. Although there is a growing literature which shows that women tend to be more (and differently) affected by economic crises than men, analyses of “The Great Resignation” have so far largely overlooked the gender dynamic. In this context, gender-blind policy responses have thus created a pretext for recovery which ignores the needs of women and minority workers. ........
The prehistoric genetic roots of the Chinese
The 50,000 year adventure
On this episode of Unsupervised Learning Razib explores the history of China through the lens of genetics and ancient DNA. This podcast is a companion to the recent two pieces, Genetic history with Chinese characteristics and Venerable Ancestors: untangling the Chinese people's hybrid Pleistocene origins. Today 92% of the citizens of the People’s Republic of China are ethnic Han, accounting for 16% of humanity. With China’s new prominence in genomics over the last decade, the genetic structure and relatedness of the Han and other ethnic groups in modern China have been extensively mapped. While India is fractured into thousands of endogamous groups, the Han Chinese are surprisingly homogeneous, with most variation dividing the North Chinese from the South Chinese. .......
No comments:
Post a Comment